Here the trunk is clearly shown and the celator (die engraver) has planned to keep his design within the standard flan, now, I have not checked every die of these Ptolemaic issues, but all that I have seen are similarly well executed. The flans are of comparable size so this is no artefact of a smaller area with which to work. And the reverse has a mark, the crossed I, which shows that the die had been checked and passed with a lost trunk, it has not worn away there is no room for it, and this at a time when Alexander was killing satraps? Only a minor point compared with the spectographic evidence correctly interpreted but a solid hint that this is the confection of a modern forger. ( Had the so-called 'late-Kushans' issued these coins one would have expected to find more of them).
Incidently, while checking the weight odf a double-daric, the alleged denomination of this coin I found that two other double darics were found in this hoard allegedly issued by Mazaios in Babylon
looks like our forger was practising!
