marcus wrote:marcus wrote:Thanks for the heads up on this one, Amyntoros. I have ordered my copy and it should arrive within the week. Doubly lucky, I noticed that they also had the Heckel/Tritle title "Crossroads of History: Alexander the Great", which Amazon has been claiming not to have for ages. So I ordered that, as well!
Well, my two new books arrived yesterday, to join the growing pile of "things to be read" (groan!). Had a quick shuftie and both titles look very good - some interesting topics in very readable format. Some of them are refreshingly short, too, which makes them ideal for reading last thing at night!
Well worth adding them to the library.
ATB
Will have to take a quick look again at
Crossroads of History - it's been a while since I read it and I recall that it contained some excellent articles. The two Alexander books I'm currently working on are the festschrift and Heckel's newest compilation,
Alexander the Great: A New History. I've only read a couple of chapters in each but thought I'd say a quick word about the two from Macedonian Legacies.
First up, Jeanne Reames'
Crisis and Opportunity: The Philotas Affair … Again. There's an interesting defense of Hephaistion included in this article - interesting because IMO there's little in the sources to indicate that Hephaistion truly
needs defending. However, I'm sure everyone is aware that some scholars treat Hephaistion's involvement in the Philotas affair with great suspicion. Jeanne's challenge to their theories is concise and quite convincing - much, much better than my muddled analysis and long-winded dispute of Heckel's remarks in the chapter on Hephaistion in his Marshals of Alexander's Empire! (Fortunately only a couple of Pothosians were subjected to it by email. And it did little to change their opinion, I might add.

) As well as the above, I'm impressed by Jeanne's use of an interdisciplinary approach. I think that many events in Alexander's life could benefit from being examined with "new" eyes, and in this article the psychology of crisis management features strongly, as well as a reference to a social study which involved torture. (Or at least the participants thought that it did.) And all this in an article only ten-and-a-half pages long!
The only other chapter I've read to date is W. Lindsay Adams'
Sport and Ethnicity in Ancient Macedonia. The title is self-explanatory, and I think that the reader's appreciation of the article will depend much on how interested they are in the subject matter. I've always had a leaning towards the social and cultural aspects of Classical Greece through the Hellenistic period, so I appreciate Adam's work. This is his second article on the subject of Alexander and sports (that I know of); the other one being
The Games of Alexander the Great in
Alexander's Empire: Formulation to Decay. In fact, there's an intriguing endnote in the current article which refers back to something Adams wrote in
The Games of Alexander the Great.
Note 29. <snip> All of these occasions (eleven altogether) solely involved the army and were for its amusement. It is also interesting to note that after Susa, Alexander stops holding torch race events and substitutes cavalry competitions (gymkhana) clearly on the grounds such use of fire for sport would be offensive to Zoroastrians, but that they had a common interest in horses. Adams, 2007, 135.
In
The Games of Alexander the Great, Adams remarks that " … there will be no mention of torch races again, the explanation for which must lie in Persian religious sensibilities. Fire was sacred to Zoroastrians, used ceremonially and not an item for play." I know how we all try to avoid using the word "must" in any of our debates, but I think it likely that Adams has hit the nail on the head here. The first games held by Alexander after Susa were in Hyrcania, after the death of Darius. The removal of torch relays is very suggestive of it being another, more successful attempt of Alexander's at being conciliatory to the Persians who were now in his army – and it makes me wonder just how many of them were with Alexander at this point, something always a subject of furious debate.
I've no more to offer until I've read more chapters (and hopefully I will soon find the time to comment in the other thread about the articles in
Alexander the Great: A New History. ) If anyone else has received Macedonian Legacies and would like to comment on other chapters - or those above - I (we) would love to hear from you.
Best regards,