Not really; you've offered conjecture and personal theories, but you haven't backed them with anything. I'm not trying to be rude here; you seem to have a genuine interest in this subject, but you're basing your ideas on, more than anything else, the mythos of people versus the actual extant record, and the coincidence of word-use.Phalanx Pursos wrote:Very persuading.
But then again, I have given you evidence.
And herein lies your problem: all the names you mentioned above are part of the Hellenic mythological tradition, which didn't always correspond with reality where Hellenes themselves were concerned, and simply had nothing to do with the reality of non-Hellene peoples.In ancient times tribes were named after the tribal leader or king; the Pelasgians were descendants of king Pelasgus, Danaans descendants of king Danaus, Egytpians descendants of king Aegyptus, Pelopides descendants of Pelops, Hellenes descendants of Hellen, Dorians descendants of Dorus, Ionians descendants of Ionas, Atreids descendants of Atreus, Perseids descendants of Perseus but Mycenae was actually named after a mushroom.
Again, I point you to the modern example: "Greeks" most certainly do not find their genesis in the tribe of the Graikoi (Γραικοι), whose name the Romans used to describe the entire ethnic group. Nor did the inhabitants of 1st century AD Deutchland call themselves "Germans", regardless of what name the Romans affixed to their "province" or what nickname Roman generals gave themselves.
Paralus,
Thanks--but sometimes I just go looking for it.
