The Souvaltzi excavation at Siwa.
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:49 am
Was Mrs Souvaltzi just making up things, or did the excavation stop due to other unknown reasons?
Mrs Souvaltzi had the confidence that the tomb of Alexander was there. So she started an excavation, along with her husband and an epigraphologist. She claimed that she found 3 inscriptions, one of which was by Ptolemy and said that Alexander's body was brought there. The inscription also says that Alexander was poisoned. Another inscription was by Trayan, the Roman Emperor who paid his respects to Alexander's body. Furthermore, she found a building that has a Doric style, and the Vergina sun.
Some rumors were spread about destructions and thefts at the site at Siwa. With direct orders from the Greek Ministry of Culture the excavation stoppped. The General Secretary of the ministry himself came down along with other archaiologists to investigate the matter, and said that they saw nothing like a Doric style building, rather than a Roman one, and no inscriptions that said what Mrs Souvaltzi had announced. When they asked her to present evidence of what she had found, she refused.
The excavation stopped there. After that, in a confference held in Plaka in Athens, the subject was discussed. Nour El Din, the head of the Cairo University, and inspector for all foreign archaiological missions in Egypt was there, and was asked about why the excavatiion stopped. He said that he didnt know, and that Mrs Souvaltzi' team was working in the most scientific way, without breaking any laws. When he asked about it, he was told that Mrs Souvaltzi should also work along with 2 at least foreign archaiologists, but he didnt hink it was appropriate. Also, that he there are questions, such as who had spread these rumors about the thefts e.t.c., and why the Greek goverment doesnt give the permission for the excavation to continue when Souvaltzi repeatedly asks for that.
The matter is complicated. As soon as Souvaltzi makes the hypothetical discovery, someone spreads rumors that aim to harm the team's credibility. However Mr Nour El Din said that the Souvaltzi' excavation was totally "by the book". The excavations stop by order of the Ministry of Culture. Archaiologists go down to Siwa and say that the part of the building uncovered is not Macedonian, and do not see the inscriptions. Souvaltzi denies to present them. However, even if the builiding was not Macedonian, the excavations should have continued. Furthermore the archailogists that came said that there were just some hellenistic period evidence amongst the rumble.
Wasnt that a reason enough for the excavation to continue?
What happened? This all is suspicious. Souvaltzi's website is very lite. If she really made that discovery, and the was forced to stop, then her website would be her base of operations, full of details and information about the excavation e.t.c. Maybe it depends on how she was forced to stop, and by whom?
What happened to the excavation after it stopped? Where is the building that the Greek archaiologists identified as Roman and not Macedonian?
Did she really find something that some people dont want it to be uncovered?
Mrs Souvaltzi had the confidence that the tomb of Alexander was there. So she started an excavation, along with her husband and an epigraphologist. She claimed that she found 3 inscriptions, one of which was by Ptolemy and said that Alexander's body was brought there. The inscription also says that Alexander was poisoned. Another inscription was by Trayan, the Roman Emperor who paid his respects to Alexander's body. Furthermore, she found a building that has a Doric style, and the Vergina sun.
Some rumors were spread about destructions and thefts at the site at Siwa. With direct orders from the Greek Ministry of Culture the excavation stoppped. The General Secretary of the ministry himself came down along with other archaiologists to investigate the matter, and said that they saw nothing like a Doric style building, rather than a Roman one, and no inscriptions that said what Mrs Souvaltzi had announced. When they asked her to present evidence of what she had found, she refused.
The excavation stopped there. After that, in a confference held in Plaka in Athens, the subject was discussed. Nour El Din, the head of the Cairo University, and inspector for all foreign archaiological missions in Egypt was there, and was asked about why the excavatiion stopped. He said that he didnt know, and that Mrs Souvaltzi' team was working in the most scientific way, without breaking any laws. When he asked about it, he was told that Mrs Souvaltzi should also work along with 2 at least foreign archaiologists, but he didnt hink it was appropriate. Also, that he there are questions, such as who had spread these rumors about the thefts e.t.c., and why the Greek goverment doesnt give the permission for the excavation to continue when Souvaltzi repeatedly asks for that.
The matter is complicated. As soon as Souvaltzi makes the hypothetical discovery, someone spreads rumors that aim to harm the team's credibility. However Mr Nour El Din said that the Souvaltzi' excavation was totally "by the book". The excavations stop by order of the Ministry of Culture. Archaiologists go down to Siwa and say that the part of the building uncovered is not Macedonian, and do not see the inscriptions. Souvaltzi denies to present them. However, even if the builiding was not Macedonian, the excavations should have continued. Furthermore the archailogists that came said that there were just some hellenistic period evidence amongst the rumble.
Wasnt that a reason enough for the excavation to continue?
What happened? This all is suspicious. Souvaltzi's website is very lite. If she really made that discovery, and the was forced to stop, then her website would be her base of operations, full of details and information about the excavation e.t.c. Maybe it depends on how she was forced to stop, and by whom?
What happened to the excavation after it stopped? Where is the building that the Greek archaiologists identified as Roman and not Macedonian?
Did she really find something that some people dont want it to be uncovered?