Actually, I don't recall that it was a problem even for his wives. The antagonism that Olympias appears to have felt towards Cleopatra/Eurydice was about the potential status of any male issue as far as it would affect Olympias' own son, rather than any sexual jealousy.amyntoros wrote:Yes, Philip was well known to be a great philanderer of both young men and young women and there’s no evidence that it was a problem for anyone except his wives.
Similarly, if one chooses to believe that Olympias was responsible for any damage done to Arrhidaeus, it wasn't because she was jealous of Philinna being in Philip's bed, whether before, during or after her own (relatively short) period of wedded bliss. Instead, it was because there was another male child (who was probably older than Alexander), who might therefore have posed a considerable threat to his ascendancy in later life.
At least, I'm not aware of any of the sources that ascribe Olympias' actions to sexual jealousy; and in the case of Arrhidaeus, if it was sexual jealousy then why did she take it out on the son? Admittedly, she did kill Cleopatra once Philip was dead, but the way she had been 'shamed' by Attalus' intimation of Alexander being a bastard, during Philip's nuptials to Cleopatra, does rather explain her extreme revenge - it wasn't quite the same as pouring a drink over her at the wedding reception, after all!

As usual, the absence of any evidence doesn't necessarily preclude sexual jealousy; but there is certainly no reason, that I'm aware of, to suggest it.
ATB