Reference to sources and Text
Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2004 6:47 am
Excuse me for my ignorance comrades,But I am not so well read on the sourses as most of you,,, Do any of the texts and sourses say or indicate that ALexander was infact defeated by Porus to the extent he had to grovel for terms.I have just read thge posts indicating Alexander was actually defeated and did a deal with Porus to help Porus in his endevours to maintain power in that region.My problem with this arguement is this, If Alexanders army was defeated and demoralised to the point of mutiny against there king who we know they adored and loved, Then why woulkd the same soldiers undertake to continue to fight for Porus cause in his aim to consolidate his own power.Im sorry but it makes no sence, If I were a soldier in Alexanders army and were fed up and demoralised under what Alexander was asking me and as we were mutinying anyway then There is no way we would carry on for a porus cause.Does this make sence as to thoroughly bin the argument that Alexander lost to Porus yet remained to fight for Porus.Regards
Kenny.I think before people should post such rediculous opinions then they should adhere to commo sense as well.
Kenny.I think before people should post such rediculous opinions then they should adhere to commo sense as well.