there seems to be a serious ommission there!?
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2004 11:30 pm
Hi guys,Sorry to indulge myself on my heritage but there seems to be a few glaring ommissions which I hope people would concur are objectively justifiable for a reminder:Sun Tzu- whose military classics is almost a must read for all military colleges.- and his Western equivalent Clauswitz ....
Kung Ming- regarded by the Chinese to be the greatest , though not so widely known in the west- he carved up a third of China assisting a general starting off with only a few thousand men (considering Chinese fought / count armies in units of 10,000s and any less than 100,000 is not considered large- some of the biggest ones involved several hundred thousands)
Kung Ming- regarded by the Chinese to be the greatest , though not so widely known in the west- he carved up a third of China assisting a general starting off with only a few thousand men (considering Chinese fought / count armies in units of 10,000s and any less than 100,000 is not considered large- some of the biggest ones involved several hundred thousands)