What is wrong with Slavic invasion theories.
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2004 11:04 am
There are strong ambivalence even in the scientific comunity to accept theory of Slavic settlement in
Macedonia ad hoc.Archeological finding of protoslavic culture are none exept one grave found
north of Skopje.
Another point is that Bisantine culture have shown
allredy cultural developed christian society in Macedonia in competition with Bisantine centres in the empire in earlier time.It is big jump from pagan cultures for unbelivable short time.
Then there are clear misrepresented facts in the
manuscript concerning the migration of Slavs.Most of the time when one is dealing with citation from them is in forgetfull mode to check last pasages dealing with destiny of Slavic people.It have been stated in numerus times that Slavs have been pushed west of Lychidus lake where they have been permamently setled.That hold the ground if we examine data for protoslavic findings in Albania. We are dealing with centuries of forced christianisation and edicts with draconic mesures.
All the findings are shown masive destruction of all Pagan cityes in Macedonia from 4-6 century.In the same time on near every location with pagan temples we have curches in continius development on city what is telling of live tradition in continium.
It is nown fact that paganism have been in some form live up to end of 7 ad.Some have other sugestion for two waves of incursion,first in 3 ad,and second in 5 ad-what is more wishfull thinking of resolving discrepances from differences
bettwen archeological and historical data.I must admit that anyone in the this field on the Balcan
peninsula have not done apropriate evaluation on the efects from the implimentation of edicts.There are acute ambivalence and fear to do this.
Macedonia ad hoc.Archeological finding of protoslavic culture are none exept one grave found
north of Skopje.
Another point is that Bisantine culture have shown
allredy cultural developed christian society in Macedonia in competition with Bisantine centres in the empire in earlier time.It is big jump from pagan cultures for unbelivable short time.
Then there are clear misrepresented facts in the
manuscript concerning the migration of Slavs.Most of the time when one is dealing with citation from them is in forgetfull mode to check last pasages dealing with destiny of Slavic people.It have been stated in numerus times that Slavs have been pushed west of Lychidus lake where they have been permamently setled.That hold the ground if we examine data for protoslavic findings in Albania. We are dealing with centuries of forced christianisation and edicts with draconic mesures.
All the findings are shown masive destruction of all Pagan cityes in Macedonia from 4-6 century.In the same time on near every location with pagan temples we have curches in continius development on city what is telling of live tradition in continium.
It is nown fact that paganism have been in some form live up to end of 7 ad.Some have other sugestion for two waves of incursion,first in 3 ad,and second in 5 ad-what is more wishfull thinking of resolving discrepances from differences
bettwen archeological and historical data.I must admit that anyone in the this field on the Balcan
peninsula have not done apropriate evaluation on the efects from the implimentation of edicts.There are acute ambivalence and fear to do this.