To what extent did ATG believe that he was a God?

This moderated forum is for discussion of Alexander the Great. Inappropriate posts will be deleted without warning. Examples of inappropriate posts are:
* The Greek/Macedonian debate
* Blatant requests for pre-written assignments by lazy students - we don't mind the subtle ones ;-)
* Foul or inappropriate language

Moderator: pothos moderators

To what extent did ATG believe that he was a God?

1. Wholeheartedly, i.e...I am a god.
0
No votes
2. Descended from the gods and therefore, a full and true demigod that is related to and favored by the gods.
3
18%
3. Descended from demigods and therefore, should be worshipped as a demigod due to divine lineage, i.e...My ancestors were divine, therefore, I am worthy of the same reverence. I may be favored by the gods.
3
18%
4. Fully aware that bloodlines might be fake. It is possible that I am descended from demigods. I must prove my status or carefully protect and nuture the divine image.
2
12%
5. I am worthy of divine status due to my accomplishments and royal status.
8
47%
6. This whole godhead thing is a great scam, and I'll ride it out for as much as I can get from it, i.e...Get Real, I Bleed!
1
6%
 
Total votes: 17

jan
Strategos (general)
Posts: 1709
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2003 2:29 pm

Incisions

Post by jan »

I won't beleaguer this subject at all, but I suppose that some source told the Jews exactly where and how to make a proper circumcision. Sacrifices were rather standard amongst most primitive groups, and no official data is ever given as to what prompted the order, belief, or whatever you want to call it, suggestion. But to always make a specific cut on a specific ear, artery, or limb would become a religious rite. Some things which appear to be superstitious are actually medically sound, and probably, Alexander was privy to Egyptian knowledge about cuts and incisions that only he would dare do. I won't beleaguer this any further as I don't for one minute believe that Alexander would ever confide that to anyone! Pure speculation! (Again, author's privileges.)
User avatar
amyntoros
Somatophylax
Posts: 2188
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 2:51 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Incisions

Post by amyntoros »

Whether wanting to beleaguer the subject or not, Jan, when you post about something on Pothos you are inviting comments from the rest of us.
jan wrote:Sacrifices were rather standard amongst most primitive groups, and no official data is ever given as to what prompted the order, belief, or whatever you want to call it, suggestion.
Bit of a rash statement, and IGÇÖm taking this to mean that you personally know of no data regarding the order or belief behind sacrifice. In truth, there is much known and there are various books on the subject. You could learn more by reading The Cuisine of Sacrifice Among the Greeks by Marcel Detienne and Jean-Pierre Vernant.
Some things which appear to be superstitious are actually medically sound, and probably, Alexander was privy to Egyptian knowledge about cuts and incisions that only he would dare do.
A very quick scan of Arrian shows no less than fifteen recorded sacrifices - not including the daily offerings - before Alexander left for Siwah (and I'm sure I've missed a few others). These included sacrifices at the Danube; the Olympian games at Aegeae; the tomb of Protesilaos at Elaeus; a bull to Poseidon at the Hellespont; to Trojan Athena at Troy; to Priam at the altar of Zeus, also Troy; to Artemis at Ephesus; at Gordium, after the thunderstorm; to Ascelpius at Soli; to the local Athena at Magarus; to the dead and the hero Amphilochus at Mallus: to Tyrian Herakles at Tyre after the victory; at Gaza before the attempt to capture the city; to Apis at Memphis; and at the foundations of Alexandria.

Hmmm, I'm sure Alexander knew full well how to properly offer a victim for sacrifice without needing to ask guidance from Ammon. :)

Best regards,
Amyntoros

Pothos Lunch Room Monitor
User avatar
marcus
Somatophylax
Posts: 4871
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2002 7:27 am
Location: Nottingham, England
Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Incisions

Post by marcus »

amyntoros wrote: Hmmm, I'm sure Alexander knew full well how to properly offer a victim for sacrifice without needing to ask guidance from Ammon. :)
Or from the Egyptians - there were plenty of Greeks who were perfectly aware of how to offer a sacrifice according to the Greek way, and had done so for hundreds of years. They were, after all, doing it in the Iliad ...

ATB
Marcus
Sine doctrina vita est quasi mortis imago
At Amazon US
At Amazon UK
User avatar
Paralus
Chiliarch
Posts: 2886
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 8:13 am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 6 times
Contact:

Post by Paralus »

G'day Jan.

Well now, the point having been severely beleaguered, not to say besieged, one thing that comes through somewhat clearly is Alexander's propensity for dismissing advice - good, bad and particularly, Parmenio proffered. I fail to see any reason for a headsrong monarch to wander out to Siwa for instruction in the making of sacfrifices he was quite capably performing already.

At the risk of belabouring the point, possibly Parmenio advised in Memphis that "Were I Alexander, I would need nor seek sacrificial instruction from any Siwa based Ammon."

We can see the king's response. Author's priveledge.
Paralus
Ἐπὶ τοὺς πατέρας, ὦ κακαὶ κεφαλαί, τοὺς μετὰ Φιλίππου καὶ Ἀλεξάνδρου τὰ ὅλα κατειργασμένους;
Wicked men, you sin against your fathers, who conquered the whole world under Philip and Alexander.

Academia.edu
User avatar
dean
Hetairos (companion)
Posts: 737
Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 3:31 pm
Location: Las Palmas, Spain

Post by dean »

Hello,

Yes, in the Iliad it is rife with sacrifices and libations and seers reading animals "innards"- more to reassure the army and give greater confidence- these were completely believed in. But not only were sacrifices important but also were signs and omens that were seen. Like the eagle picking up the snake in its beak.(forgotten where I read that one) Alexander allowed a Syrian woman to watch over his sleep whose prophesies all came true!!!! :o
Good God, bizarre or what??????
:?

Best regards,
Dean
carpe diem
User avatar
amyntoros
Somatophylax
Posts: 2188
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 2:51 pm
Location: New York City

Post by amyntoros »

dean wrote: Good God, bizarre or what??????
:?
Only if viewed by someone who isn't a believer in the "religion" of the period. (And not always then: Familiarity with the ancient beliefs can make some of the practices seem quite understandable and even comforting.) If you think about it, an atheist or a follower of a different religion who has never been exposed to Judaism or Christianity - unlikely as that may be - would probably find the practices of the church and the centuries of belief in the tales from the old and new testament to be equally bizarre.
:)

Best regards,
Amyntoros

Pothos Lunch Room Monitor
User avatar
amyntoros
Somatophylax
Posts: 2188
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 2:51 pm
Location: New York City

Post by amyntoros »

ScottOden wrote:I believe the papyrus in question is the Turin Judicial Papyrus; this contains the details of the Harem Conspiracy against Ramesses III (and I made a mistake -- Ramesses III belongs to the 20th Dynasty. He ruled from 1183-1152 BCE). However, the fragments I've been able to find online didn't mention the oracle. I'll look around, though, and see if I can find a more complete translation.
Hi Scott,

I've been remiss in answering this and I'm so sorry for the delay. Yes, if you find anything I'll be very grateful - this is much more your field than mine. It's the preparation of the priests of Ammon for the ritual of the oracle that interests me the most as it isn't to be found in any of the Greek sources. If it isn't in the Turin Judicial Papyrus then I imagine its in some other Egyptian text.

By the way, do you have a publication date for Memnon yet? :)

Best regards,
Amyntoros

Pothos Lunch Room Monitor
User avatar
Paralus
Chiliarch
Posts: 2886
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 8:13 am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 6 times
Contact:

Post by Paralus »

amyntoros wrote:[If you think about it, an atheist or a follower of a different religion who has never been exposed to Judaism or Christianity - unlikely as that may be - would probably find the practices of the church and the centuries of belief in the tales from the old and new testament to be equally bizarre.
Spot-on! Before anyone takes exception to the below, I am a Roman Catholic. Right, declarations out of the way...

I've often wondered what ET might think when, upon visiting our earth and seeing the great Christian cathederals, he is confronted by a god - or the son of a god - being worshipped by a congregation whose forebears crucified the object of worhip.

Better still, indulging in ritual symbolic cannibalism!
dean wrote:Good God, bizarre or what??????
Paralus
Ἐπὶ τοὺς πατέρας, ὦ κακαὶ κεφαλαί, τοὺς μετὰ Φιλίππου καὶ Ἀλεξάνδρου τὰ ὅλα κατειργασμένους;
Wicked men, you sin against your fathers, who conquered the whole world under Philip and Alexander.

Academia.edu
ScottOden
Pezhetairos (foot soldier)
Posts: 121
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 7:12 pm
Location: Southern US
Contact:

Post by ScottOden »

amyntoros wrote:By the way, do you have a publication date for Memnon yet? :)
Hi Amyntoros,

I'm still looking around for the papyrus containing the bit about the oracle (though I think it's located in one that was found with the Turin Judicial, but I don't have a name for it yet). There's a great resource online which contains quite a few translations of Egyptian papyri (and probably the one we're looking for) here: http://nefertiti.iwebland.com/texts/index.html.

Thanks for asking about Memnon! It's scheduled for publication in hardcover in August and should be available where ever fine books are sold ;) A few weeks ago, it received a very nice review from Publishers Weekly. They called it "an eloquent and captivating historical thriller that chronicles the life of Memnon of Rhodes . . . a combination of vivid conjecture, deft plotting and graceful prose." As you might can tell, I'm rather excited :)

Also if you live in the UK, my first book, Men of Bronze, is going to be released in paperback on July 31st from Bantam. It's the story of the Persian invasion of Egypt in 525 BCE, from the point-of-view of a Phoenician mercenary.

Okay, that's enough self-promotion from me :)

Best,

Scott
jan
Strategos (general)
Posts: 1709
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2003 2:29 pm

Post by jan »

:twisted: :lol: Oh Linda, I love it. I can always depend upon you to have all the sources at your fingertips. Thanks so much! I can't stop laughing yet! well, that ploy worked, didn't it? However, just as the egyptians know how to keep secrets, like nobody yet knows the secrets of the pyramids, so too does Alexander know how to keep secrets. I suppose that is why secret fraternities became so popular and are yet discussed today even. However, a Greek oracle would give Alexander the idea that he is truly invincible while an Egyptian oracle is the one that gives him the belief in his divinity, as his mother had believed and told him. It is like the combination of baptism and then confirmation in certain Christian faiths. I have undergone both baptism and confirmations! So too Alexander went from one oracle to another, and while one may know from elementary sacrifice, one may learn a secret for a more graduated sacrifice, a little like the difference between having a bachelor's degree, a master's degree, and finally, a doctorate! That is how I see the variation in oracles! Finally, Alexander has gone from being only invincible to assurance that he is GOD! PhD!
Post Reply