Greetings,
Hmmm, I am still not convinced you understood my posts, but I'll let it go at this point.
Regards,
Sikander
ALEXANDER THE GREAT MACEDONIAN -BOOK WRITTEN BY ALEXANDER
Moderator: pothos moderators
-
THE LIGHT 7000
Re: S-Your Reply
Dear S,
... So it was opposite of what you are saying and what you think- anyway you are close to yourself...,
it does not matter any more about me..., you must be clear with your self, free will my friend...
Bon voyage...
The Light
... So it was opposite of what you are saying and what you think- anyway you are close to yourself...,
it does not matter any more about me..., you must be clear with your self, free will my friend...
Bon voyage...
The Light
-
S
Re: S-Your Reply
Greetings,
I realize now that you have no idea *what* I was saying, and you have no idea what I think (and it might surprise you to know what it is I *do* think!).. that *is* okay, really... because I have read and re-read all your postings to *try* to get to the main point of your thought, and it somewhat obscure....
I *think* you are saying you believe- and the book leads you to believe- that Alexander was a Messenger of Light, bringing a message of Unity to the world, as well as other Mesengers such as Yeshua, Ghandi, et al, etc..
but the reality is, it is hard to bring a message of light to people you have harmed...to try to unify a people after you have overrun them makes it hard to sell a message of peace.
*Not* to say that Alexander did not have visions of
trying to create a unified empire in which (some) men would be judged on merit- but he did not take the thought nor the vision far enough- he could not- as different as he was from his peers, he was still part of a culture of violence, still a product of that culture, as well as a product of cultures and events that preceded him..as such, he fell short of the mark. Alexander did not hold certain prejudices that his contemporaries held, but he still had his blind spots...as do we all.
So the questions under discussion seem to be:
The veracity of the book and the following:
Did Alexander had a vision of world unity?
Did Alexander know who- and what- he was? And what was this, if anything?
Did Alexander "commune" with the God during those "fugue states"? Or was he always cognizant of a secondary voice/vision? Or was he driven by his own vision?
Was he Divine or divinely inspired or driven by his own will and ambition?
Is there a movement coming out of Macedonia today that is preparing to make a "grand statement" to the world regarding the new world to come"? And, who would "run" this new world? Or are we talking about a "new world" as predicted Biblically and elsewhere in which there are the "chosen" and the "fallen away"?
Or is it really about a plutocractic theocracy based on power and the ability to control others through fear, political control and a sense of "knowing what is best for everyone" with the muscle to back it up (Oliver Stone would have a field day with this)?
Many, many questions, few answers forthright and spoken clearly..and therein lies the difficulty of discussion here.
Regards,
Sikander
I realize now that you have no idea *what* I was saying, and you have no idea what I think (and it might surprise you to know what it is I *do* think!).. that *is* okay, really... because I have read and re-read all your postings to *try* to get to the main point of your thought, and it somewhat obscure....
I *think* you are saying you believe- and the book leads you to believe- that Alexander was a Messenger of Light, bringing a message of Unity to the world, as well as other Mesengers such as Yeshua, Ghandi, et al, etc..
but the reality is, it is hard to bring a message of light to people you have harmed...to try to unify a people after you have overrun them makes it hard to sell a message of peace.
*Not* to say that Alexander did not have visions of
trying to create a unified empire in which (some) men would be judged on merit- but he did not take the thought nor the vision far enough- he could not- as different as he was from his peers, he was still part of a culture of violence, still a product of that culture, as well as a product of cultures and events that preceded him..as such, he fell short of the mark. Alexander did not hold certain prejudices that his contemporaries held, but he still had his blind spots...as do we all.
So the questions under discussion seem to be:
The veracity of the book and the following:
Did Alexander had a vision of world unity?
Did Alexander know who- and what- he was? And what was this, if anything?
Did Alexander "commune" with the God during those "fugue states"? Or was he always cognizant of a secondary voice/vision? Or was he driven by his own vision?
Was he Divine or divinely inspired or driven by his own will and ambition?
Is there a movement coming out of Macedonia today that is preparing to make a "grand statement" to the world regarding the new world to come"? And, who would "run" this new world? Or are we talking about a "new world" as predicted Biblically and elsewhere in which there are the "chosen" and the "fallen away"?
Or is it really about a plutocractic theocracy based on power and the ability to control others through fear, political control and a sense of "knowing what is best for everyone" with the muscle to back it up (Oliver Stone would have a field day with this)?
Many, many questions, few answers forthright and spoken clearly..and therein lies the difficulty of discussion here.
Regards,
Sikander
-
THE LIGHT 7000
Re: S-Your Reply
Dear S,
... I must admit that you are out of reality-COMPLETLY...
AS I SAID BON VOYAGE TO WHERE YOU BELONGS I DO NOT CARETHE LIGHT
... I must admit that you are out of reality-COMPLETLY...
AS I SAID BON VOYAGE TO WHERE YOU BELONGS I DO NOT CARETHE LIGHT
-
S
Re: S-Your Reply
Greetings,
Well there are many realities- obviously.
Best of luck with yours.
Regards,
Sikander (who still maintains that asking questions is the first path to understanding)
Well there are many realities- obviously.
Best of luck with yours.
Regards,
Sikander (who still maintains that asking questions is the first path to understanding)