Pop Culture Alexander

This moderated forum is for discussion of Alexander the Great. Inappropriate posts will be deleted without warning. Examples of inappropriate posts are:
* The Greek/Macedonian debate
* Blatant requests for pre-written assignments by lazy students - we don't mind the subtle ones ;-)
* Foul or inappropriate language

Moderator: pothos moderators

User avatar
amyntoros
Somatophylax
Posts: 2188
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 2:51 pm
Location: New York City

Re: And yet another myth!

Post by amyntoros »

Now you just *knew* your post would make me wonder and then go searching for the source, didn't you? :-) Of course, it had to be in the last place I looked - Valerius Maximus, Book VIII. 11. ext. 2 How Great are the Effects of the Arts."Moreover, how great do we suppose was the respect paid by king Alexander to the dignity of art, who would have himself painted only by Apelles and sculpted only by Lysippus?"I should also include D. R. Shackleton Bailey's note here. "None of the Greek sources asserts the exclusion of other artists by royal edict. This looks like a pleasant but legendary touch in the Latin tradition and not the whole of it either. Cic. Fam. 5.12.7 only has potissimum." (C. O. Brink on Hor. Ep. 2.1.239)"I'm not going to ask what potissimum means! (g) I've been trying since yesterday to avoid making a wordplay with the other latin quote that I questioned on the Son of Alexander thread. A clue - the Oxford American dictionary shows testis and testes as having the same meaning!! Best regards,Amyntoros
Amyntoros

Pothos Lunch Room Monitor
Post Reply