heirs

This moderated forum is for discussion of Alexander the Great. Inappropriate posts will be deleted without warning. Examples of inappropriate posts are:
* The Greek/Macedonian debate
* Blatant requests for pre-written assignments by lazy students - we don't mind the subtle ones ;-)
* Foul or inappropriate language

Moderator: pothos moderators

manny05

Re: heirs Part deux

Post by manny05 »

Alexander had Homeric plans, plans that required a Homeric pedigree. He had Homeric parents all right, but divine parents under the worst possible track lighting: Philip was a philandering Zeus, Olympias a cantankerous Hera. He just wanted to get the hell out of THIS waking Hades! And what? Sire a son and leave it with either of THEM? No way Praxiteles!Manny E
Institute of Psychonalysts Ten Tokes Over The Line
User avatar
amyntoros
Somatophylax
Posts: 2188
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 2:51 pm
Location: New York City

Re: heirs

Post by amyntoros »

No prob! I figured you didn't have your computer files handy. :-)
Amyntoros

Pothos Lunch Room Monitor
User avatar
marcus
Somatophylax
Posts: 4871
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2002 7:27 am
Location: Nottingham, England
Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: heirs

Post by marcus »

Well, 'handy' in that I *could* get to them ... not handy in that I was too lazy! :-)M
Marcus
Sine doctrina vita est quasi mortis imago
At Amazon US
At Amazon UK
abm
Pezhetairos (foot soldier)
Posts: 248
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 2:38 pm

Re: heirs Part deux

Post by abm »

Hi Marcus,it is mentionned in the Metz Epitome."it's fair to say that the reasons for disbelieving it are, in fact, just as good"i'm afraid i cannot agree with you here. The sources are all we have and the "testis unus testis nullus"-principle doesn't really work for antiquity, especially since, as you said, there are very good reasons why the other sources would not mention it.regards,abm
User avatar
marcus
Somatophylax
Posts: 4871
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2002 7:27 am
Location: Nottingham, England
Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: heirs Part deux

Post by marcus »

Hi Alexander,It looks as if we'll have to disagree, then :-)However good the reasons for believing the story to be true are, the fact that it is *only* mentioned in the Metz Epitome (thanks for correcting me on that) is a perfectly good reason to doubt its veracity.Personally I am inclined to believe it, but I can't say that there is any better reason to do so.CheersMarcus
Marcus
Sine doctrina vita est quasi mortis imago
At Amazon US
At Amazon UK
Post Reply