Re: ReviewsGǪ
Moderator: pothos moderators
Re: to Davorka Molslavac (Lane)
It was very strange! No matter how I put in your address I couldn't get it to go. I'm very glad you checked here for it. Thanks again to Pothos for letting us get it right.
Re: ReviewsGǪ
hi tim, we are all dying over here! what's the scoop on the movie?did oliver stone hold true to his promise to keep this a real true story or what. as far as sitting next to angelina, my regrets also. my girls met here in n.y.city and said she was the most down to earth gal and never big headed or trying to be a famous person, just like us normal folk. tina
-
ancientlibrary
- Pezhetairos (foot soldier)
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 2:37 am
Re: ReviewsGǪ
[Oh, whoops. I started a message instead of a
reply to an old message. Bad form, sorry. ]Not seen it yet. You guys will be the first to know. I'm dreading it being bad. As I see itGÇöpersonal
opinion, don't flameGÇöthe standard indicators
are troubling, e.g Oliver Stone directs. Have you
noticed how Stone's directorial role is not
played-up much in the promotions? That's a
new tack!On the other side, Robin Lane Fox has come
out so strongly. He's a personal idol (more for
Pagans and Christians * than
Alexander the Great ), and I trust his
judgment, artistic as well as historical. More, I
don't see what angle he has in being so forward
in his approval of the movie.*On Pagans and Christians a Classics
prof. of mine posted a funny photograph. It was
George Lucas and his son, wearing a Star Wars
costume, taken from a newspaper profile of
Lucas. They were posing in Lucas' library and
thereGÇöclear as dayGÇöwas Pagans and
Christians in the shelf by Lucas head. Shock
of the familiar, as they say. If Stone can do
Alexander, why not Lucas Julian?
reply to an old message. Bad form, sorry. ]Not seen it yet. You guys will be the first to know. I'm dreading it being bad. As I see itGÇöpersonal
opinion, don't flameGÇöthe standard indicators
are troubling, e.g Oliver Stone directs. Have you
noticed how Stone's directorial role is not
played-up much in the promotions? That's a
new tack!On the other side, Robin Lane Fox has come
out so strongly. He's a personal idol (more for
Pagans and Christians * than
Alexander the Great ), and I trust his
judgment, artistic as well as historical. More, I
don't see what angle he has in being so forward
in his approval of the movie.*On Pagans and Christians a Classics
prof. of mine posted a funny photograph. It was
George Lucas and his son, wearing a Star Wars
costume, taken from a newspaper profile of
Lucas. They were posing in Lucas' library and
thereGÇöclear as dayGÇöwas Pagans and
Christians in the shelf by Lucas head. Shock
of the familiar, as they say. If Stone can do
Alexander, why not Lucas Julian?
Re: ReviewsGǪ
Congratulations, Tim, on getting the inside scoop.
-
S
Re: ReviewsGǪ
Greetings Tim,I've seen it and was disappointed in the NG staff work.. the "facts" were odd, indeed.The commentators (Fox, Chugg, O'Brien) presented their material well, though I may not always agree with their conclusions. I did not review it here, but Halil has expressed interest in doing a more in-depth review so I will wait for that posting.Regards,
Sikander
Sikander