The new evidence makes the woman 30 -34 too old for any known consort of either man but perfect for Kyannane, who seems to have been forgotten in favour of a wholly unknown Skythian unattested in the sources. Let's hope they re-examine the occupant of Tomb III's remains, if it turns out to be a young woman we will have proof that this is Kassandros' triple burial. The heroon would then attach itself to Tomb I and make that Amyntas who did have honours elsewhere; the finding of four babies and a neonate raise some questions they cannot belong to the woman found in the Tomb as the pregnancies would overlap, which is impossible, nor did the Macedonians hang on to their dead children like the Egyptians; they might be evidence of infanticide or high status infant mortality.
In the interest of completeness it has to be said that the circumstantial evidence does favour Philip II and that the objections of Philip III's proponents have been shown to be erroneous, as in the case of the barrel vault, or are not as clear cut as stated, Attic Salt cellars (largely style based). It would be nice if the new analysis could give a definitive answer but its agenda are already showing; as is clear from its 'definitive answer'
Amyntoros, 'was' is a verb not a preposition so carry on drinking it is not affeting your grammar
edited to reassure Amyntoros
