I have a cool thing called a Google Alert, that sends me an email whenever a new post is made on the Internet about any of my chosen phrases - and one of them is Alexander the Great. This throws up a lot of interesting things, but just lately, large numbers of them have been about modern-day Afghanistan. The interesting thing is that about half of them start with words to the effect 'No-one has conquered in Afghanistan since Alexander the Great' and the other half say things like, 'No-one has ever conquered in Afghanistan, not even Alexander the Great'.
(The verb varies - sometimes it's won, or subdued, or pacified and I guess that does make a difference.)
I wonder why there is this difference of opinion among the average political blogger? Why the different perceptions? So this is my question - does the panel think Alexander won in Afghanistan, or not?
(And does anyone know of a map of Alexander's campaigns that shows the outlines of modern national boundaries on it?)
Fiona