A Hephaistion Quiz!

Discuss Alexander's generals, wives, lovers, family and enemies

Moderator: pothos moderators

Post Reply
Semiramis
Hetairos (companion)
Posts: 403
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 12:24 pm

A Hephaistion Quiz!

Post by Semiramis »

Not kidding people.

http://www.funtrivia.com/trivia-quiz/Pe ... 82149.html

What's your score?? :)
Jemina

Post by Jemina »

I should start to do more productive things than read books on Alexander's life - I got 15/15 :shock:
User avatar
Paralus
Chiliarch
Posts: 2875
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 8:13 am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by Paralus »

An interesting quizz. I failed on two accounts: Hephaestion's Persian wife and what unit he joined "on reaching manhood".

I have absolutely no argument with the former: his marriage liitle interests me. The second is rather more problematic though. At Gaugamela Diodorus (17.61.3) says:
Of the most prominent group of commanders, Hephaestion was wounded with a spear thrust in the arm; he had commanded the bodyguards.
Now, the actual Greek is "somatophylakes". This does not mean the "seven" for Hephaestion was not a member of this group at the time. In the time of Philip the "foot guard" were referred to as "symatophylakes" though - a reason why Ptolemy (a source for Arrian) often still refers to the hypaspists as such (on more than a few occasions) - to him they are interchangeable.

It is therefore most likely that Hephaestion was commanding the agema of the hypaspists at Gaugamela. He certainly commanded no Companion Cavalry troop. They are listed by Arrian by commander by squadron. Hephaestion rates not a mention.
Last edited by Paralus on Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Paralus
Ἐπὶ τοὺς πατέρας, ὦ κακαὶ κεφαλαί, τοὺς μετὰ Φιλίππου καὶ Ἀλεξάνδρου τὰ ὅλα κατειργασμένους;
Wicked men, you sin against your fathers, who conquered the whole world under Philip and Alexander.

Academia.edu
User avatar
marcus
Somatophylax
Posts: 4785
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2002 7:27 am
Location: Nottingham, England

Post by marcus »

Jemina wrote:I should start to do more productive things than read books on Alexander's life - I got 15/15 :shock:
I got 14, but I hadn't read Paralus's post properly and plumped for "bodyguard" rather than my first choice, which was the correct answer. So I claim that, morally, I had 15! :D

ATB
Marcus
Sine doctrina vita est quasi mortis imago
At Amazon US
At Amazon UK
derek
Pezhetairos (foot soldier)
Posts: 125
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:47 pm
Location: Rhode Island USA

Post by derek »

In fact, the question can't be answered. Hephaestion doesn't get a mention until Troy, so the question-setter can't know for certain which unit he joined aged 17 or 18. But it's a fair bet it would have been the Companions.

Derek
User avatar
marcus
Somatophylax
Posts: 4785
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2002 7:27 am
Location: Nottingham, England

Post by marcus »

derek wrote:In fact, the question can't be answered. Hephaestion doesn't get a mention until Troy, so the question-setter can't know for certain which unit he joined aged 17 or 18. But it's a fair bet it would have been the Companions.
That is, of course, very true. Well spotted. However, I reckon you have the right of it - I wouldn't put money on his not joining the Companions!

ATB
Marcus
Sine doctrina vita est quasi mortis imago
At Amazon US
At Amazon UK
User avatar
Thomas
Site Admin
Posts: 366
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2002 9:20 pm
Location: Essex, UK
Contact:

Post by Thomas »

I got 12. Which shows why I long ago stopped creating original content for the site!
Thomas
Aymez loyaulté
karen
Hetairos (companion)
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 7:03 am

Post by karen »

Yeah, the problem with quizzes is that they assume answers that are known definitely to be correct. I blew the unit question too.

I thought question #1 was a bit misworded... I imagine a certain old one-eyed individual would be spinning in his tomb, if he were still there, to see Makedonia called a "province"...
Jemina

Post by Jemina »

I must admit that three of my answers were wild but lucky guesses :D
User avatar
Fiona
Hetairos (companion)
Posts: 346
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: England

Post by Fiona »

Yay, 15 - that was fun. Thank you for posting the link!
Fiona
User avatar
Paralus
Chiliarch
Posts: 2875
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 8:13 am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by Paralus »

derek wrote:In fact, the question can't be answered. Hephaestion doesn't get a mention until Troy, so the question-setter can't know for certain which unit he joined aged 17 or 18. But it's a fair bet it would have been the Companions.
At eighteen he, like other pages, most likely joined the agema of the hypaspists. This an an argument well made by Heckel and with which I'd agree. He, like Seleucus, is not attested in the Companian cavalry untill later in their carreers. Some of these nobles, graduautes of the school of pages, went on to command phalanx battalions as well.
Paralus
Ἐπὶ τοὺς πατέρας, ὦ κακαὶ κεφαλαί, τοὺς μετὰ Φιλίππου καὶ Ἀλεξάνδρου τὰ ὅλα κατειργασμένους;
Wicked men, you sin against your fathers, who conquered the whole world under Philip and Alexander.

Academia.edu
User avatar
Vergina Sun
Pezhetairos (foot soldier)
Posts: 131
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 3:24 pm
Location: USA

Post by Vergina Sun »

I somewhat cheated because I read all of your posts before taking the test. I also had to flip a coin on the one with Abdalonymus - couldn't remember if he was weeding or washing. I feel silly about that now. Somehow or other, I managed a 15. It's probably out of pure luck though. :oops:
Semiramis
Hetairos (companion)
Posts: 403
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 12:24 pm

Post by Semiramis »

Hey, you guys are all doing well. The average for that quiz is 8/15.

I got 15/15 too. But I do have a bit of an unhealthy obsession with Alexander and Hephaistion. :oops:

Now Paralus, Derek, why did I think that anybody who was important (nobles, Alexander's friends etc) would have automatically been part of the companion cavalry when they reached manhood?

Karen, Question 1 made me wonder about the wording too. "Greece" was hardly one united "state" with "provinces" at the time. Bit anachronistic perhaps?
derek
Pezhetairos (foot soldier)
Posts: 125
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:47 pm
Location: Rhode Island USA

Post by derek »

The way I'd imagined it is that the sons of Macedonian nobility started off as pages to learn the ropes of being a nobleman/courtier, then those suitable for the military "graduated" to the Companions. The Companion cavalry was almost a depot for noblemen, riding close to the king and in his eye. Those who distinguished themselves, either in combat or socially, would then get promotion to the command of a unit, and climb the ladder that way.

I know the arguments about Foot Companions and so on, but I think that was more of a battle honour than an indication of pedigree. And that's because I just don't see noblemen being willing to stand in ranks and march everywhere like common infantry. Philip and Alexander rode horses into battle and their entourage would have galloped along behind. The Companion cavalry; the name says it all.

Derek
User avatar
amyntoros
Somatophylax
Posts: 2188
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 2:51 pm
Location: New York City

Post by amyntoros »

derek wrote:I know the arguments about Foot Companions and so on, but I think that was more of a battle honour than an indication of pedigree. And that's because I just don't see noblemen being willing to stand in ranks and march everywhere like common infantry. Philip and Alexander rode horses into battle and their entourage would have galloped along behind. The Companion cavalry; the name says it all.
Wouldn't this mean, therefore, that Hephaistion's first appointment was most likely a command in the infantry - he wasn't a member of the Macedonian nobility after all? :)

Best regards,
Amyntoros

Pothos Lunch Room Monitor
Post Reply